Jacksazzy Court: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "The '''Jacksazzy Court''' was a period of the Supreme Court during which Jacksazzy was Chief Justice. It followed the Roberts Court...") |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The '''Jacksazzy Court''' was a period of the [[Supreme Court of the United States|Supreme Court]] during which [[Jacksazzy]] was Chief Justice. It followed the Roberts Court and preceded the [[Clark Court]]. Most notably, it used a challenge to ''Citizens United'' to nullify the concept of corporate personhood, later overturned by the [[Lamport Court]]. Overall, the Jacksazzy Court was perceived as radical and unpredictable, with its judgement on corporate personhood hailed as a notoriously poor decision | The '''Jacksazzy Court''' was a period of the [[Supreme Court of the United States|Supreme Court]] during which [[Jacksazzy]] was Chief Justice. It followed the Roberts Court and preceded the [[Clark Court]]. Most notably, it used a challenge to ''Citizens United'' to nullify the concept of corporate personhood, later overturned by the [[Lamport Court]]. Overall, the Jacksazzy Court was perceived as radical and unpredictable, with its judgement on corporate personhood hailed as a notoriously poor decision by liberal and conservative jurists alike. Jacksazzy served as Chief Justice from February to May, 2018. | ||
=Justices= | =Justices= | ||
Revision as of 10:36, 10 March 2021
The Jacksazzy Court was a period of the Supreme Court during which Jacksazzy was Chief Justice. It followed the Roberts Court and preceded the Clark Court. Most notably, it used a challenge to Citizens United to nullify the concept of corporate personhood, later overturned by the Lamport Court. Overall, the Jacksazzy Court was perceived as radical and unpredictable, with its judgement on corporate personhood hailed as a notoriously poor decision by liberal and conservative jurists alike. Jacksazzy served as Chief Justice from February to May, 2018.
Justices
Incumbents are in bold.